Hello folks
If you're pressed for time, here's the short version:

WOW!

Now for the fine detail.

This weekend's National 400km audax/brevet from Theale, near Reading, seemed like a perfect opportunity to give a real workout to the Inspired Cycle Engineering Trice XL that Rob Hague of Westcountry Recumbents has kindly offered to me for the 1200km Paris-Brest-Paris in August. And also an opportunity to compare the XL as a mount for audax (essentially fast touring) rides with my '97 Trice.

 

The XL has 406 ERTRO wheels all round and is a much lower machine than my Trice, with a seat height of around 8 inches and a minimum ground clearance of, ooh, not a lot. The seat angle is somewhat more reclined than the traditional Trice: About 35 degrees maximum recline, I'd say (the recline can be adjusted in the workshop; I rode with the seat fully reclined). The mesh seat is taller than older Trice seats and has a more upright section at the top for shoulder support, but stops short of providing a headrest a la Greenspeed. A mix of Shimano 105 chainset and front mech, LX rear mech and 11-32 9-speed block, and bar-end shifters provides a gear range of 19-95 inches. The chain has a single pulley on the drive side; upstream and downstream of the pulley and for the whole of the return side it runs through a tube, so it's exposed only at chainwheel, pulley, and rear mech: No more black right legs... The bottom bracket is relatively low in relation to the seat. Braking uses Sturmey Archer drums on the front wheels; left Nexave lever controls left brake via a short cable run, right lever controls right brake. There's a V-brake on the back wheel actuated by a thumb lever on the lower left bars to provide an extremely neat and effective parking brake. The elegantly curved bars are in three sections, secured by neat metal clamps, so are adjustable for width and reach. Cable runs seem excellent; nothing looks as though it might snag or get abraded. Rob's XL has Schwalbe City Jet front tyres and a Tioga Comp Pool rear.

The XL seems to be built to a very high standard, with fillet-brazed joints and an excellent paint job. There are lots of classy touches: brazed on dynamo brackets on the chainstays, allen bolt rear mudguard mountings (no bent metal bridges), an extra set of bottle bosses under the seat. So that a conventional rear rack can be mounted at around head height, machined extender plates attached via bosses near the dropouts provide lower attachment points for the rack legs. The rack has a plate at the back that aids light fitting. A neat bracket off the bottom of the left kingpin provides an attachment point for a cycle computer sensor. The frame appears very stiff. Using the informal 'How hard do I grunt when I pick it up?' test, the XL is a bit lighter than my Trice, so at the svelte rather than chunky end of the trike spectrum.

It's a very good-looking machine, in the eyes of this observer and just about everyone who got a look at it over the weekend.

The course for the National 400 was quite hilly and encompassed a wide range of conditions: smooth main roads, minor roads, potholed and gravel-strewn lanes, 'gated roads' (single-lane jumped-up cart tracks with cattle grids and rocks and vegetation everywhere), speed bumps, steep climbs, steady climbs, gradual descents, steep descents, heh heh heh.

The XL handled it all with aplomb (indeed, with several plombs). A few observations:

It's very quiet--no chain slap, only a faint chatter from the tubes. So quiet that my friend Ian, who rode with me on the Cheltenham 200, immediately noticed the difference from my Trice.

It's extremely comfortable. In the best part of 24 hours on the road I felt no need for neck support with the reclined seat. The extra recline means less weight on the buttocks and seems to help lessen road shock.

It descends like a brick dropped off a cliff. I recorded 80.7 kph on Streatley hill (16 percent), despite having to brake briefly and swerve to avoid a lump of wood.

It can swerve at 80 kph ;-) The extra lowness makes a perceptible difference to handling. I rarely even considered leaning on the XL.

It climbs well--for a recumbent trike. On numerous occasions I was able to pass riders on steady climbs (this is not totally without precedent on my Trice, but it seemed to happen quite a lot on the XL). On steep climbs the XL was marginally slower than uprights. I finished in the middle of the field (entrants, not grass), which is rather further up than I would expect on a trike.

It's very quick when conditions are favourable: Smooth surfaces, gently rolling terrain. You can build up speed and hold it. Extra effort goes straight into the back wheel; if you kick, it kicks.

It makes a very comfy bed for roadside naps.

It can handle speed bumps OK, despite the lowness. Nothing grounded.

Though the rear derailleur is low to the ground, it emerged unscathed from the 'gated roads.'

So much for the praise. What about the bad points?

Perhaps half a dozen times in 440 km the heels of my size 43 shoes grazed the ground in places where there were undulations in the road surface. (A switch to Comp Pools on the front wheels would give a bit more heel clearance since they have a larger section. Of course, if this is a major issue there's always the Trice Explorer, which shares many of the features of the XL but has a higher seat.) I'm happy to accept this as a price for the efficient climbing.

An encounter with vegetation on a cratered gated road neatly removed a full waterbottle from the underseat cage. Next time I'll velcro the bottle into place.

That's about it for the carping... Apart from the worst point of all--it's got to go back to Rob after PBP :-(

Peter

   
 
Inspired Cycle Engineering Ltd, Unit 9 Spencer Carter Works, Tregoniggie Ind. Est., Bickland Water Road, Falmouth, Cornwall, TR11 4SN